A no-API prompt library. Each prompt includes input fields, purpose, audience, output format and a verification rule. Prompts guide the learner’s own tool; IEU does not run an AI model here.
Inputs: [Topic or question]
[Context and material supplied]
[Constraints and intended audience]
Task: Ask for the setting, population or materials, key concepts, time window and intended use. Produce three candidate questions with scope, feasible evidence and unresolved choices.
Output: A structured response with assumptions, evidence needed, limitations and a verification checklist.
Boundary: Do not invent facts about a real site; distinguish exploratory questions from hypotheses.
Verification: Check every factual claim against an original source; check calculations independently; label uncertainty; remove any invented citation.
Research methods
Source trail auditor
Audit a short source list for traceability.
Show full prompt
Audience: Independent learners and educators
Inputs: [Topic or question]
[Context and material supplied]
[Constraints and intended audience]
Task: For each supplied citation, identify what metadata is present, what is missing, what claim it could support and how to verify the original. Return a verification table.
Output: A structured response with assumptions, evidence needed, limitations and a verification checklist.
Boundary: Never fabricate a DOI, author, page, quotation or access status.
Verification: Check every factual claim against an original source; check calculations independently; label uncertainty; remove any invented citation.
Critical reading
Claim-evidence separator
Separate a passage into claims, evidence and inference.
Show full prompt
Audience: Independent learners and educators
Inputs: [Topic or question]
[Context and material supplied]
[Constraints and intended audience]
Task: Quote only short user-provided phrases; label claims, evidence, assumptions, uncertainty and alternative explanations.
Output: A structured response with assumptions, evidence needed, limitations and a verification checklist.
Boundary: Do not treat a polished argument as verified evidence.
Verification: Check every factual claim against an original source; check calculations independently; label uncertainty; remove any invented citation.
Research methods
Methods-fit comparator
Compare candidate methods against a question.
Show full prompt
Audience: Independent learners and educators
Inputs: [Topic or question]
[Context and material supplied]
[Constraints and intended audience]
Task: Assess each supplied method for fit, feasibility, assumptions, bias risks, ethical concerns and what it cannot answer.
Output: A structured response with assumptions, evidence needed, limitations and a verification checklist.
Boundary: Do not declare one method universally superior.
Verification: Check every factual claim against an original source; check calculations independently; label uncertainty; remove any invented citation.
Data analysis
Measurement definition coach
Turn a concept into candidate indicators.
Show full prompt
Audience: Independent learners and educators
Inputs: [Topic or question]
[Context and material supplied]
[Constraints and intended audience]
Task: For each indicator, state operational definition, unit, collection method, missingness risk and possible proxy mismatch.
Output: A structured response with assumptions, evidence needed, limitations and a verification checklist.
Boundary: Do not imply an indicator fully captures a complex concept.
Verification: Check every factual claim against an original source; check calculations independently; label uncertainty; remove any invented citation.
Data analysis
Sampling plan reviewer
Review a sample without overclaiming representativeness.
Show full prompt
Audience: Independent learners and educators
Inputs: [Topic or question]
[Context and material supplied]
[Constraints and intended audience]
Task: Inspect target population, recruitment, inclusion criteria, nonresponse and what conclusions remain limited.
Output: A structured response with assumptions, evidence needed, limitations and a verification checklist.
Boundary: Do not infer representativeness from sample size alone.
Verification: Check every factual claim against an original source; check calculations independently; label uncertainty; remove any invented citation.
Data analysis
Chart reading protocol
Interpret a supplied chart in a disciplined order.
Show full prompt
Audience: Independent learners and educators
Inputs: [Topic or question]
[Context and material supplied]
[Constraints and intended audience]
Task: Describe axes, units, population, pattern, uncertainty and source before offering a cautious interpretation.
Output: A structured response with assumptions, evidence needed, limitations and a verification checklist.
Boundary: Do not infer causation from a chart alone.
Verification: Check every factual claim against an original source; check calculations independently; label uncertainty; remove any invented citation.
Data analysis
Statistical result explainer
Explain a supplied statistical result for a non-specialist.
Show full prompt
Audience: Independent learners and educators
Inputs: [Topic or question]
[Context and material supplied]
[Constraints and intended audience]
Task: Define the statistic, assumptions, uncertainty and practical meaning; ask for missing method details.
Output: A structured response with assumptions, evidence needed, limitations and a verification checklist.
Boundary: Do not recalculate or invent unavailable sample details.
Verification: Check every factual claim against an original source; check calculations independently; label uncertainty; remove any invented citation.
Research methods
Qualitative codebook starter
codes for supplied text.
Show full prompt
Audience: Independent learners and educators
Inputs: [Topic or question]
[Context and material supplied]
[Constraints and intended audience]
Task: Suggest code names, definitions, inclusion/exclusion rules and examples using only provided material.
Output: A structured response with assumptions, evidence needed, limitations and a verification checklist.
Boundary: Mark codes as; do not claim intercoder reliability.
Verification: Check every factual claim against an original source; check calculations independently; label uncertainty; remove any invented citation.
Research methods
Interview guide critic
Review questions for clarity, neutrality and sensitivity.
Show full prompt
Audience: Independent learners and educators
Inputs: [Topic or question]
[Context and material supplied]
[Constraints and intended audience]
Task: Flag leading, double-barrelled or inaccessible questions and propose neutral revisions.
Output: A structured response with assumptions, evidence needed, limitations and a verification checklist.
Boundary: Do not collect sensitive personal data unless there is an approved process.
Verification: Check every factual claim against an original source; check calculations independently; label uncertainty; remove any invented citation.
Research methods
Literature map organizer
Group supplied sources by concept or disagreement.
Show full prompt
Audience: Independent learners and educators
Inputs: [Topic or question]
[Context and material supplied]
[Constraints and intended audience]
Task: Create themes, evidence types, tensions, date/context gaps and next search terms.
Output: A structured response with assumptions, evidence needed, limitations and a verification checklist.
Boundary: Do not claim comprehensive coverage from a small supplied set.
Verification: Check every factual claim against an original source; check calculations independently; label uncertainty; remove any invented citation.
Critical reading
Counterargument finder
Identify the strongest reasonable alternative to a claim.
Show full prompt
Audience: Independent learners and educators
Inputs: [Topic or question]
[Context and material supplied]
[Constraints and intended audience]
Task: State what evidence would support the alternative and what could distinguish explanations.
Output: A structured response with assumptions, evidence needed, limitations and a verification checklist.
Boundary: Do not create a strawman or present speculation as fact.
Verification: Check every factual claim against an original source; check calculations independently; label uncertainty; remove any invented citation.
Academic writing
Citation verification checklist
Prepare a checklist for checking citations against originals.
Show full prompt
Audience: Independent learners and educators
Inputs: [Topic or question]
[Context and material supplied]
[Constraints and intended audience]
Task: Return exact fields to verify and a claim-to-source map based on supplied records.
Output: A structured response with assumptions, evidence needed, limitations and a verification checklist.
Boundary: Never complete missing bibliographic data by guessing.
Verification: Check every factual claim against an original source; check calculations independently; label uncertainty; remove any invented citation.
Academic writing
Plain-language abstract editor
Improve clarity in a user-authored abstract.
Show full prompt
Audience: Independent learners and educators
Inputs: [Topic or question]
[Context and material supplied]
[Constraints and intended audience]
Task: Preserve meaning; mark every substantive change; identify claims needing source verification.
Output: A structured response with assumptions, evidence needed, limitations and a verification checklist.
Boundary: Do not add results, citations or novelty claims.
Verification: Check every factual claim against an original source; check calculations independently; label uncertainty; remove any invented citation.
Critical reading
Argument structure mapper
Map a supplied argument into premises and conclusion.
Show full prompt
Audience: Independent learners and educators
Inputs: [Topic or question]
[Context and material supplied]
[Constraints and intended audience]
Task: Show missing premises, evidence dependencies, possible objections and uncertainty.
Output: A structured response with assumptions, evidence needed, limitations and a verification checklist.
Boundary: Do not treat validity of structure as truth of premises.
Verification: Check every factual claim against an original source; check calculations independently; label uncertainty; remove any invented citation.
Research methods
Evidence synthesis boundary check
Check whether a synthesis claim exceeds its sources.
Show full prompt
Audience: Independent learners and educators
Inputs: [Topic or question]
[Context and material supplied]
[Constraints and intended audience]
Task: Compare claim scope with source populations, dates, methods and independence.
Output: A structured response with assumptions, evidence needed, limitations and a verification checklist.
Boundary: Do not state consensus unless the sources support that description.
Verification: Check every factual claim against an original source; check calculations independently; label uncertainty; remove any invented citation.
Ethics
Research ethics scenario reviewer
Surface questions for an educational scenario.
Show full prompt
Audience: Independent learners and educators
Inputs: [Topic or question]
[Context and material supplied]
[Constraints and intended audience]